Douglas Vandergraph Faith Ministry from YouTube

There are moments when ideas don’t arrive like lightning. They don’t announce themselves. They don’t demand attention. They just sit there. Quiet. Persistent. Unfinished. And I’ve learned over time that when a thought refuses to leave me alone, it’s usually because it’s trying to teach me something.

This is one of those moments.

The way these things usually happen for me isn’t dramatic. It’s not mystical. It’s internal. It’s a slow-moving conversation that unfolds in my mind while I’m doing something ordinary—driving, walking, sitting quietly, staring out a window. A question surfaces, and instead of rushing to answer it, I let it linger. I let it speak. And then, almost without realizing it, I start talking back to myself.

That’s where clarity tends to come from.

This particular conversation started with a question that felt almost… inappropriate at first. Not wrong. Just unexpected.

Did Jesus know how to read and write?

Not as a trick question. Not as a provocation. Just a genuine observation. I realized that I couldn’t remember many moments in Scripture where Jesus is shown reading texts or writing things down. No letters. No journals. No recorded teachings in His own handwriting. And once I noticed that absence, I couldn’t un-notice it.

So the conversation began.

“Well,” I thought, “why wouldn’t He?”

And then another part of me answered, “I’m not saying He didn’t. I’m just saying it’s interesting how little emphasis Scripture places on it.”

That’s usually how these internal dialogues go. One side raises a question. The other side pushes back. Not to shut it down, but to test it.

And as I let that back-and-forth continue, I realized something important. This wasn’t really a question about literacy. It was a question about authority.

Where did Jesus’ authority come from?

Because we live in a world where authority is almost always tied to documentation. Degrees. Credentials. Publications. Proof. If someone claims influence, we ask where they studied. If someone teaches, we want their sources. If someone speaks with confidence, we want to know what qualifies them.

And Jesus doesn’t fit neatly into any of that.

So I kept thinking.

Scripture does show Him reading. There’s that moment in the synagogue where He reads from the scroll of Isaiah. He doesn’t stumble. He doesn’t hesitate. He reads clearly, deliberately, then sits down and says something that shakes the room. “Today this Scripture is fulfilled in your hearing.”

That’s not accidental. That’s intentional.

So yes, He could read.

And then there’s that one fleeting moment where He writes. He bends down and writes in the dirt while an angry crowd waits for Him to condemn a woman. We’re never told what He wrote. It’s not preserved. It’s not explained. It disappears as quickly as it appears.

And I remember thinking, “That’s fascinating.”

The only thing Jesus ever wrote… He didn’t make permanent.

And that realization shifted the entire conversation.

Maybe Jesus didn’t avoid writing because He couldn’t.

Maybe He avoided it because He didn’t need to.

And then the internal resistance showed up.

“But wouldn’t it have helped?” I thought. “Wouldn’t it have been clearer if He had written things down? Wouldn’t it have prevented confusion later? Wouldn’t it have settled disagreements?”

And then another thought responded, quietly but firmly.

“Or would people have clung to the words and missed the Way?”

That stopped me.

Because it exposed something about us.

We trust what’s written more than what’s lived.

We treat documents as authority and experience as secondary. We assume permanence equals truth. And yet Jesus chose something radically different. He chose people.

He didn’t leave behind notebooks. He left behind disciples.

He didn’t entrust His message to paper first. He entrusted it to memory, obedience, transformation, and relationship. Long before a single Gospel was written, the message of Jesus was already moving through the world carried by ordinary people who had heard Him speak and couldn’t forget it.

That matters.

Because before Christianity was a written tradition, it was a lived one.

And that realization made the conversation turn inward.

“What does that say about how I think faith is supposed to work?” I asked myself.

Because I’ve spent years around religious culture. I’ve watched people measure spiritual maturity by how much they know, how well they quote Scripture, how articulate they are, how confidently they can explain theology. And while knowledge matters—deeply—it’s not the source of authority.

Jesus’ authority didn’t come from education.

It came from intimacy with the Father.

And suddenly those old words from the religious leaders made more sense. “How does He know these things, having never studied?”

What they were really saying was, “We don’t recognize the source of His authority.”

Because His authority didn’t come from their system.

And then the conversation took another turn.

I started thinking about all the people who feel disqualified from faith because they don’t feel educated enough. They don’t know the verses. They don’t know the theology. They don’t know how to say things the right way. They feel like faith belongs to people with better words than theirs.

And Jesus walks straight into that assumption and dismantles it.

He doesn’t choose scholars to start His movement.

He chooses people willing to follow.

Fishermen. Laborers. Outsiders. People without platforms. People without credentials. People without polished language.

And somehow, those are the people He trusted to carry His message into the world.

That’s not accidental.

Truth doesn’t require polish to be powerful.

Authority doesn’t come from vocabulary.

It comes from alignment.

And as I sat with that, the conversation got uncomfortably personal.

“How often,” I asked myself, “do I postpone obedience because I think I need to know more first?”

“How often do I mistake preparation for delay?”

Because you can read endlessly and still miss Him.

You can quote Scripture and never live it.

You can be articulate and spiritually disconnected.

And you can also struggle with words and walk closely with Christ.

Jesus wrote very little.

But His life rewrote history.

And that realization lingered.

Because it reframed everything.

The most powerful things I will ever “write” won’t be written at all. They’ll be lived. They’ll be seen in how I forgive when it costs me. How I love when it’s inconvenient. How I stay faithful when no one notices. How I speak truth without needing to prove myself.

Jesus didn’t leave notebooks.

He left a path.

And that’s where the conversation paused—not because it was finished, but because it was deepening.

Because once you realize the question isn’t about literacy, you start asking a harder one.

If Jesus trusted living truth over written proof… what does that require of me?

That question stayed with me longer than I expected.

If Jesus trusted living truth over written proof, what does that require of me?

Because once that thought settled in, it stopped being theoretical. It stopped being about history, literacy, or even theology in the abstract. It became personal. It became uncomfortable in the way truth often is when it asks something of you rather than simply informing you.

I realized how deeply conditioned I am—how deeply we are—to believe that permanence comes from paper. That legitimacy comes from documentation. That something only really matters if it’s recorded, archived, validated, and preserved in a form others can inspect.

And yet, Jesus chose a different kind of permanence.

He chose memory.

He chose embodiment.

He chose transformation that could not be undone simply because the words weren’t written down.

The more I sat with that, the more I realized how radical that choice actually was. Jesus lived in a culture that revered written Scripture. Scrolls were sacred. Words mattered deeply. And still, He did not anchor His mission to writing His own text. Instead, He spoke words that lodged themselves in people so deeply they would carry them for the rest of their lives.

That kind of transmission requires trust.

It requires faith in people.

And that’s not something we talk about often enough.

Jesus trusted people to remember Him.

Not perfectly. Not flawlessly. But faithfully.

He trusted that truth, when lived, would reproduce itself.

And that realization reshaped the way I think about my own life of faith.

Because I’ve spent a lot of time trying to capture truth. Trying to articulate it clearly. Trying to explain it well. Trying to preserve it in words that won’t be misunderstood. And none of that is wrong. Words matter. Teaching matters. Scripture matters.

But there’s a danger in thinking that explanation is the same as embodiment.

And Jesus never confused the two.

He didn’t say, “Learn what I say.”

He said, “Follow Me.”

That’s a very different invitation.

Following requires movement. Risk. Presence. Attention. It requires decisions made in real time, not just ideas stored for later. It requires living in a way that reflects something deeper than comprehension.

And that’s where the conversation turned inward again.

I started asking myself questions I don’t always like to ask.

Do I trust lived obedience as much as I trust written clarity?

Do I believe God can work through imperfect expression?

Do I secretly believe that if I can’t explain something well enough, it must not be valid?

Because if I’m honest, I often measure myself by my ability to articulate rather than my willingness to obey. I feel confident when I can explain truth clearly, and hesitant when I can’t. But Jesus never made clarity the prerequisite for faithfulness.

He made availability the prerequisite.

And that’s when I thought about the disciples again.

None of them started as theologians. None of them began with polished language or systematic understanding. Most of them asked questions that revealed how little they understood. They misunderstood Jesus constantly. They argued about status. They missed the point repeatedly.

And Jesus kept them anyway.

He didn’t say, “Come back when you understand this better.”

He said, “Stay with Me.”

And something about that struck me deeply.

Jesus seemed far more interested in proximity than precision.

Far more concerned with presence than performance.

Far more focused on relationship than résumé.

And that tells me something important about how God works.

God is not limited by our articulation.

He is not constrained by our vocabulary.

He is not waiting for us to reach some intellectual threshold before He moves.

What He asks for is trust.

What He invites is faithfulness.

What He honors is obedience lived out over time.

And then another layer of the conversation emerged.

I started thinking about how often we underestimate the power of a life quietly lived in truth. We celebrate the visible. The documented. The shareable. The measurable. And yet, some of the most transformative moments in history were never written down at all.

A conversation that changed someone’s direction.

A decision made in private.

An act of forgiveness no one applauded.

A choice to remain faithful when walking away would have been easier.

Those moments don’t leave paper trails.

But they leave impact.

And Jesus seemed to know that.

That’s why the only thing He ever wrote was temporary. Written in dirt. Erased by time. Gone almost immediately. As if to say, “What matters here isn’t what’s written. It’s what’s revealed.”

And I can’t shake the thought that if He had written volumes, we might have worshiped the pages and missed the path.

So the conversation settled into something quieter.

Less questioning.

More listening.

I realized that the original question—whether Jesus could read and write—was never really the point. It was the doorway into a deeper realization about how faith actually works.

Faith is not sustained by documentation alone.

It is sustained by lives that carry truth forward.

Lives that reflect something different.

Lives that are shaped by presence with Christ rather than mastery of information about Him.

And that doesn’t diminish Scripture. It deepens it. Because Scripture itself points us not just to words, but to a Way. Not just to information, but to transformation.

And that’s when the conversation reached its conclusion.

Not with certainty about every detail.

Not with a tidy answer that resolves all tension.

But with clarity about what matters most.

Jesus could read.

Jesus could write.

But what He chose to do was far more demanding.

He chose to live truth so completely that it could not be contained on a page.

He chose to invest in people rather than documents.

He chose to trust that a life lived in obedience would speak louder than anything written down.

And that leaves me with a simple, challenging question I can’t ignore.

Am I more committed to explaining truth… or to living it?

Because at the end of the day, the most powerful testimony I will ever offer is not something I write.

It’s who I become.

It’s how I love.

It’s how I forgive.

It’s how I remain faithful when no one is watching.

Jesus didn’t leave notebooks behind.

He left a path.

And my calling is not just to understand it—but to walk it.

That is where the conversation ended.

Not because there was nothing left to say.

But because there was something left to live.

Your friend,
Douglas Vandergraph

Watch Douglas Vandergraph’s inspiring faith-based videos on YouTube

Support the ministry by buying Douglas a coffee

#faith #christianliving #spiritualreflection #discipleship #followingjesus #faithjourney #christianencouragement